-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
are we filling the flux registers correctly for SDC? #658
Comments
actually.. I think it is the quadrature rule weights. And we should only add to the flux register for the last iteration. |
it's a bit more tricky... since we only compute the advection term once, for iteration = 0, we need to store the flux in the flux register then. The remainder of the time nodes need to be added to the flux register on the last iteration, all with the proper weights. So the flux register needs to persist over the entire iteration structure. |
confusion no. 2: if we are doing 4 iterations, then we have the following: iteration so do we want to use the fluxes from iteration 3 or 2 for the flux registers? |
Implements reflecting BCs for PLM reconstruction with SDC (issue #652) Implements the density and temperature limits to burning for SDC (issue #598) Fixes the weighting of the flux registers for SDC (#658) Implements a well-balanced scheme for 2nd order PLM reconstruction (#294) Also adapts the bubble_convergence problem to work as a test for the well-balanced method and can now do second-order or fourth order initial model generation. Changes the meaning of the plm_iorder flag to now do 1 = piecewise constant, 2 = 2nd order MC limiter, and >= 3 for 4th order MC limiter Adds support for HSE boundary conditions in +X and +Y
Do we need to weight the fluxes added to the flux registers by the dt between time nodes? Or perhaps using the quadrature rule?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: