You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes it opens the catalog sometimes it opens one of the pinned threads. This thing should be thought out. But it's not clear what thread exactly should be opened? Lets say you have three pinned threads. When clicking the notification which one of them should we open? Then one with thread lastest post? Or the one where you were mentioned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
K1rakishou
changed the title
[BUG/IMPROVEMENT] Thread opening by notification clicking is inconsistent
[BUG/IMPROVEMENT] Thread opening by clicking on the watcher notification is inconsistent
Oct 3, 2019
The current logic is as follows:
If there's one thread with new posts, open that thread.
If there's more than one thread with new posts, open the bookmark sidebar so the user can pick what thread they want to view.
Personally I'm fine with how it's currently implemented, but if we were to assign priority for opening up a thread, it would be quotes first, followed by latest post timestamp, just like how you said. No new posts at all should just open up the bookmark sidebar, so it still has some functionality in that edge case.
Oh, so that's how it is I didn't even notice that. Yeah, I agree that if there are no new posts at all then we should open the bookmarks list.
K1rakishou
changed the title
[BUG/IMPROVEMENT] Thread opening by clicking on the watcher notification is inconsistent
[IMPROVEMENT] Thread opening by clicking on the watcher notification is inconsistent
Oct 12, 2019
Sometimes it opens the catalog sometimes it opens one of the pinned threads. This thing should be thought out. But it's not clear what thread exactly should be opened? Lets say you have three pinned threads. When clicking the notification which one of them should we open? Then one with thread lastest post? Or the one where you were mentioned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: