-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider switching away from Redis #1
Comments
Are you sure you read the announcement properly?
Seems like we are not affected. |
Do all main contributors continue to work if their are not redis employes and have to contribute with redis license? |
"The SSPL is not recognized as free software by the Open Source Initiative (OSI), Red Hat, and Debian as the aforementioned provision is discriminatory towards specific fields of use." I expect Linux distributions will drop Redis. Looks like Fedora Rawhide already has redict packaged (and is testing versions for 38, 39, and 40), and someone is working on packaging it in Debian. |
Redis is being used to handle rate limiting. Recently, Redis dropped their open-source license, so new versions will not be open-source, and likely won't be packaged in any Linux distributions. There are two forks main forks that came out of this change that I expect will get some traction in Linux packaging:
Another alternative would be memcached or similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: