(ws) Add export map and esm entrypoint

[weswigham]

This mirrors the export map and esm entrypoint provided by ws at runtime.

[typescript-bot]

@weswigham Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• ws — on npm, on unpkg
  • Config files to check:
    • ws/OTHER_FILES.txt: not the expected form
    • ws/index.d.mts: edited
    • ws/package.json: not the expected form (check: exports)

Code Reviews

Because this is a widely-used package, a DT maintainer will need to review it before it can be merged.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• 🕐 A DT maintainer needs to approve changes which affect module config files

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 11 days — please try to get reviewers!

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 57234,
  "author": "weswigham",
  "headCommitOid": "60c9163e88c317f7399fde0e5dcedc4fa6ce9cb1",
  "lastPushDate": "2021-11-17T21:23:57.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2021-11-29T18:06:45.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Critical",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "ws",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/ws/OTHER_FILES.txt",
          "kind": "package-meta",
          "suspect": "not [the expected form](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#user-content-other_filestxt)"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/ws/index.d.mts",
          "kind": "package-meta",
          "suspect": "edited"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/ws/package.json",
          "kind": "package-meta",
          "suspect": "not [the expected form](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#user-content-packagejson) (check: `exports`)"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "loyd",
        "mlamp",
        "TitaneBoy",
        "reduckted",
        "teidesu",
        "wojtkowiak",
        "k-yle"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "mainBotCommentID": 972054694,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @loyd @mlamp @TitaneBoy @reduckted @teidesu @wojtkowiak @k-yle — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[typescript-bot]

Re-ping @loyd, @mlamp, @TitaneBoy, @reduckted, @teidesu, @wojtkowiak, @k-yle:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

[sandersn]

@weswigham From what I understand of esm export maps, this is correct and won't break existing uses. So should I merge this?

[weswigham]

I was hoping one of the maintainers would show up, but yeah.