Is there a reason the Bearer authorization header is not used?

[jtsternberg]

We have a working Drip integration, but were looking to switch to the official library. But the way authentication happens does not work for us (we get authentication errors). However if switch to using the Bearer authorization token header, things work as expected. E.g.

... 
$client = new \GuzzleHttp\Client();

$req_params = [
    'base_uri' => $this->api_end_point,
    'handler' => $stack,
    'timeout' => $this->timeout,
    'connect_timeout' => $this->connect_timeout,
    'http_errors' => false,
    'headers'  => array(
        'User-Agent' => $this->user_agent(),
        'Accept' => 'application/json, text/javascript, */*; q=0.01',
        'Content-Type' => 'application/vnd.api+json',
    	'Authorization' => 'Bearer ' . $this->api_token,
    ),
];
... switch case statement ...

$res = $client->request($req_method, $url, $req_params); 

[jtsternberg]

Anyone home?

[will-in-wi]

Hey, sorry, this got overlooked. We haven't been spending much time on this client in a while, but I'll throw a ticket in the queue for this.

[tiannaavery]

Thanks for your patience on this one! Version 1.4.0 has a new client definition that supports Bearer authentication.