✨ Allow a user to select from default project thumbnails

[jsaq007]

What do these changes do?

Allow users to see select thumbnails from services and from a default template list in the projects .

Related issue/s

• resolves Default project thumbnails osparc-issues#1247 Default project thumbnails
• fixes Dashboard; list views have low contrast osparc-issues#1234 Dashboard; list views have low contrast

How to test

Dev Checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

DevOps Checklist

[pcrespov]

very colourful ... even green (are you sure?)! :-)
thx

[mguidon]

Nicely done. @pcrespov green is on me. An incentive to create proper ones...

[ignapas]

If thumbnail is empty, it display like this

There is the layout problem, but I also don't get why do we want to show the same suggestions for all services... Doesn't a S4L service have different suggestions than a sleeper?
Also, if I use a URL in osparc.editor.ThumbnailSuggestions that does not correspond to an existing image, an empty square is shown which can still be selected.
P.D.: Sometimes there is a thumbnail but the thumbnail suggestions are still shown very small...

[jsaq007]

If thumbnail is empty, it display like this There is the layout problem, but I also don't get why do we want to show the same suggestions for all services... Doesn't a S4L service have different suggestions than a sleeper? Also, if I use a URL in osparc.editor.ThumbnailSuggestions that does not correspond to an existing image, an empty square is shown which can still be selected. P.D.: Sometimes there is a thumbnail but the thumbnail suggestions are still shown very small...

@ignapas This should now be resolved.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a5a0a44) 87.4% compared to head (690d48f) 87.3%.

❗ Current head 690d48f differs from pull request most recent head 92066b9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 92066b9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5334     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    87.4%   87.3%   -0.2%     
========================================
  Files        1313    1321      +8     
  Lines       54035   54181    +146     
  Branches     1172    1172             
========================================
+ Hits        47270   47323     +53     
- Misses       6515    6608     +93     
  Partials      250     250             

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.9% <77.4%> (-0.1%)	⬇️
unittests	85.2% <90.2%> (-0.2%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...rc/simcore_service_autoscaling/core/application.py	97.8% <100.0%> (-2.2%)	⬇️
...g/src/simcore_service_autoscaling/core/settings.py	97.9% <100.0%> (ø)
...e_service_autoscaling/modules/auto_scaling_core.py	94.3% <100.0%> (ø)
...vice_autoscaling/modules/auto_scaling_mode_base.py	81.4% <100.0%> (ø)
...scaling/modules/auto_scaling_mode_computational.py	91.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...e_autoscaling/modules/auto_scaling_mode_dynamic.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
.../simcore_service_autoscaling/utils/utils_docker.py	99.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...rc/simcore_service_webserver/payments/_socketio.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...simcore_service_webserver/projects/projects_api.py	84.3% <100.0%> (ø)
...rc/simcore_service_webserver/socketio/_handlers.py	85.8% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 3 more

... and 29 files with indirect coverage changes

[ignapas]

thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud