⚗️ Use uv to replace pip

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

NOISY PR

• introduce uv, an extremely fast pip replacement done by the same team as Ruff
• introduce setup uv github action to install uv in the CI (uses latest).
• fixes some missing dependencies in a few packages w.r.t. prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator
• adapted Dockerfiles to use uv instead of pip (@pcrespov please give special thoughts on service-integration), uses latest 0.1.X version for now (this also speeds up devel mode startup time)
• adapted the ci.txt/prod.txt/dev.txt files as uv does not like entries such as ../models-library it needs one of -e, -c or -r or package-name @ path/to/package
• replaced all calls to pip install with uv pip install
• replaced all calls to pip-sync with uv pip sync
• replaced all calls to pip-compile with uv pip compile
• uniformized CI calls for unit/integration/system tests
• migrated deprecated pck_resources to importlib.resources, importlib.metadata

BEFORE

AFTER

--> 8x faster installation of webserver

Interesting note

• make build resolves in 225 seconds on my machine, 180s are used to compile the frontend

Installation

curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
# or via pip
pip install uv

Related issue/s

How to test

make build
make build-devel
cd services/web/server # to install the webserver
make install-dev

Dev Checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

DevOps Checklist

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.00000% with 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.5%. Comparing base (347ccc6) to head (1223041).

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #5350   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    87.5%   87.5%           
======================================
  Files        1318    1318           
  Lines       54197   54164   -33     
  Branches     1176    1174    -2     
======================================
- Hits        47431   47406   -25     
+ Misses       6516    6509    -7     
+ Partials      250     249    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.1% <62.9%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
unittests	85.3% <85.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-library/src/aws_library/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...s-library/src/dask_task_models_library/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...ages/models-library/src/models_library/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...database/src/simcore_postgres_database/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...ackages/service-library/src/servicelib/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...kages/service-library/src/servicelib/utils_meta.py	100.0% <100.0%> (+13.7%)	⬆️
.../settings-library/src/settings_library/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
packages/simcore-sdk/src/simcore_sdk/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
services/agent/src/simcore_service_agent/_meta.py	100.0% <100.0%> (+15.0%)	⬆️
...eeper/src/simcore_service_clusters_keeper/_meta.py	100.0% <100.0%> (+7.6%)	⬆️
... and 12 more

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

[wvangeit]

This is just for our compilation/build, right? It won't be exposed to the user?
I'd just be a bit afraid to expose a tool that's only in development since 6 months or so, wrt compatibility issues.

But otherwise, great that we have faster build times now.

[mrnicegyu11]

dope! looking forward thx

[matusdrobuliak66]

Wau thanks a lot! looking forward.

[pcrespov]

great job and greatly appreciated!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud