🐛 fix wrong project order_by of 'name' field

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🐛 When a client provides a search query parameter when listing projects we join also users table in the db query so we can do full text search for example of name column in users table. When the client in addition provides also the order_by query parameter and is interested in the name field (which is provided by project.name) then the order by query was sorted by users.name and not projects.name. This PR fixes it.

@jsaq007 This is the fix for the issue reported by you

Related issue/s

How to test

pytest tests/unit/with_dbs/02/test_projects_crud_handlers__list_with_query_params.py

Dev Checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

DevOps Checklist

[GitHK]

👍

[wvangeit]

Nice

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3eb91a9) 87.4% compared to head (f1e484a) 80.9%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5356      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    87.4%   80.9%    -6.5%     
=========================================
  Files        1313     539     -774     
  Lines       54034   27119   -26915     
  Branches     1172     202     -970     
=========================================
- Hits        47259   21957   -25302     
+ Misses       6525    5112    -1413     
+ Partials      250      50     -200     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.8% <0.0%> (-1.2%)	⬇️
unittests	86.6% <100.0%> (+1.3%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...erver/src/simcore_service_webserver/projects/db.py	97.1% <100.0%> (-0.9%)	⬇️

... and 903 files with indirect coverage changes

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud