✨ api-server: New study jobs metadata entrypoints

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

• ✨ Implements custom metadata entrypoint for study jobs
  • get_study_job_custom_metadata as GET/{study_id}/jobs/{job_id}/metadata
  • replace_study_job_custom_metadata as PUT /{study_id}/jobs/{job_id}/metadata
  • It essentially reuses the implementation of the solver jobs couterparts
• 🔨 Enhances backend mock
  • New mock capture fully generated using new --spy-httpx-calls-enabled=true
  • mocked_backend fixture prototypes how to mock iterable responses. This is a prototype that will eventually move into the implementation of create_respx_mock_from_capture fixture
• ♻️ Moves jobs business logic to services following controller/service/repository pattern

Related issue/s

• Implements custom metadata entrypoints in Full implementation of all missing study api endpoints https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-issues/issues/1291 #5814

How to test

cd services/api-server
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests/unt/api_studies/test_api_routers_studies_jobs_metadata.py`

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.3%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (63945fe).
Report is 243 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5690      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    84.5%   84.3%    -0.3%     
=========================================
  Files          10     717     +707     
  Lines         214   34630   +34416     
  Branches       25     714     +689     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   29203   +29022     
- Misses         23    5264    +5241     
- Partials       10     163     +153     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.1% <ø> (?)
unittests	82.7% <ø> (-1.8%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 714 files with indirect coverage changes

[bisgaard-itis]

Very nice! Thanks a lot 🚀

[matusdrobuliak66]

👍

[GitHK]

Nice, just a few comments you might want to consider

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.2% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud