Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: missing elements within HUDU integration #3607

Open
esrocom opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request]: missing elements within HUDU integration #3607

esrocom opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@esrocom
Copy link

esrocom commented Feb 10, 2025

Description of the new feature - must be an in-depth explanation of the feature you want, reasoning why, and the added benefits for MSPs as a whole.

First fo all let me start by saying that I love the new integration with hudu.
We were already working with the MS365 integration Hudu - MS365 and by adding this integration we got way more visibility and some really nifty links to the cipp instance when more information or manageability is required.
However...
I do miss some elements of the standard MS365 integration like:
Unlicensed users
Share Mailbox info
Easy copy function of the mailadress
The more than nice overview of assigned licences (see attachment)
Image

I would suggest that the CIPP-Hudu integration show us at least the same as the Hudu - MS365 integration.

IF done we can simply delete the Hudu - MS365 integration to make our Hudu lean & Mean :)

@esrocom esrocom added enhancement New feature or request no-priority labels Feb 10, 2025
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant