Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add diskrecovery command #1843
feat: add diskrecovery command #1843
Changes from all commits
ac0e97a
8616c51
f6234b5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the provided code patch, here are some observations:
However, it's important to note that the provided code patch is just a small excerpt, and without the full context and surrounding code, it's difficult to provide an extensive review. It is recommended to conduct a thorough review of the entire codebase to identify any potential issues or improvements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code patch you provided appears to be a modification to a documentation file rather than actual code. Therefore, it is difficult to perform a comprehensive code review. However, based on the information provided, there are a few suggestions:
Since this patch only contains changes to the documentation, it is unlikely to introduce bugs or risks in the code itself. Nonetheless, it's always important to ensure accuracy and clarity in the documentation to assist users in understanding and utilizing your code effectively.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upon reviewing the provided code patch, a few observations and suggestions can be made:
DiskRecoveryCmd Class:
Split
andMerge
functions in theDiskRecoveryCmd
class are empty. If they are intended to perform specific functionalities, you should implement them accordingly.Clone
function ofDiskRecoveryCmd
, it is recommended to use smart pointers (std::unique_ptr
orstd::shared_ptr
) instead of raw pointers for better memory management.Code Formatting:
Error Handling:
Documentation:
Note: The provided code snippet is relatively small, making it difficult to identify any specific bugs or risks without a broader context of the codebase and its requirements. A comprehensive code review would typically involve examining the entire codebase and understanding its architecture and design choices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, the code patch you provided looks fine. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement and potential bug risks:
In the
DiskRecoveryCmd
class, theSplit
function is declared but does not have an implementation. Make sure to implement it according to your requirements. If it's not needed, consider removing the declaration.In the
Merge
function of theDiskRecoveryCmd
class, there is an empty body. If theMerge
function is intended to be empty, it would be clearer to indicate that by using theoverride
keyword followed by a semicolon, like this:void Merge() override {};
.In the
CommandCmd
class (not shown in the code patch), ensure that it has the necessary member functions implemented and properly defined. Verify that any overridden functions have the correct implementation according to their base class declarations.Consider using smart pointers (
std::unique_ptr
orstd::shared_ptr
) instead of raw pointers where appropriate. Smart pointers help manage memory automatically, reducing the likelihood of memory leaks and other related bugs.Refactor repetitive code, such as the
DoInitial
function, into a common base class if possible. This encourages code reuse and reduces duplication.Remember to pay attention to the implementation details outside the code patch you provided to ensure the overall correctness and efficiency of your code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's difficult to provide a comprehensive code review without seeing the entire codebase or having more context. However, based on the provided code patch:
In
DiskRecoveryCmd
, theSplit
andMerge
functions are empty. It's important to make sure these functions are properly implemented if they are expected to perform specific tasks. Otherwise, consider removing them if they are not needed.In the
Clone
function ofDiskRecoveryCmd
, you're returning a raw pointer to a dynamically allocated object. This can lead to memory leaks if not handled correctly. Consider using smart pointers likestd::unique_ptr
instead or ensuring proper memory management.It's unclear what
DoInitial
is meant to do in bothHelloCmd
andDiskRecoveryCmd
. Make sure the implementation of this function aligns with its intended purpose.Without further information about the functionality and usage of the
Cmd
class, it's challenging to provide additional improvement suggestions or assess potential bug risks.Consider providing more code context or specific areas of concern for a more detailed review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
这里是不是没有处理当resume失败时,设置对应返回值