Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Robonomics (XRT) parachain config #51

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

akru
Copy link

@akru akru commented Jan 27, 2025

Description

XRT is the utility token that will make it possible to control IoT devices on top of the Ethereum network and the Robonomics parachain in Polkadot ecosystem.

Robonmics is a Polkadot parachain and ERC20 token on Ethereum. This PR aims to use Snowbridge to bring XRT to Polkadot.

Feel free to any comments to improve this PR.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 27, 2025

@akru is attempting to deploy a commit to the Snowfork Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@alistair-singh
Copy link
Collaborator

alistair-singh commented Jan 27, 2025

Hey @akru, do you just want to bridge the XRT token to Asset Hub and the Robonomics chain?

There are a few steps that need to happen in the Robonomics chain runtime before it can accept Snowbridge tokens.

  1. An HRMP channel open between Asset Hub and Robonomics chain.
  2. Robonomics chain must accept DOT as an execution fee for XCM.
  3. Robonomics chain must be able to store the bridged assets and DOT in a pallet such as orml-tokens or pallet-assets.
  4. Support Asset Hub as a reserve for DOT and Bridged Assets in the Robonomics xcm configuration.
  5. Support a fairly current version of pallet-xcm. One that has the pallet-xcm.transferAssetsUsingTypeAndThen
  6. If Robonomics requires EVM support then there needs to be a precompile created for pallet-xcm.transferAssetsUsingTypeAndThen extrinsic so that it can be signed by ethereum wallets.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants