You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two blocks allowing you to insert blockquotes in the post, one called blockquote and the other pullquote. They output slightly different markup.
I don't understand the redundancy here: why two blocks that do, semantically, the same thing? Shouldn't this be block styles/options territory?
One uses a <blockquote> at the root level, the other is the same but with a <figure> wrapper. Wouldn't it be more consistent and flexible to use the <figure> wrapper on both blocks?
Better yet, why not make them just one block and provide a block option variation like other blocks do?
Let's discuss!
Desktop (please complete the following information):
OS: MacOS Mojave (10.14.6)
Browser: Chrome
Version: 77
Additional context
Gutenberg bundled with core in 5.2.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are two blocks allowing you to insert blockquotes in the post, one called
blockquote
and the otherpullquote
. They output slightly different markup.I don't understand the redundancy here: why two blocks that do, semantically, the same thing? Shouldn't this be block styles/options territory?
One uses a
<blockquote>
at the root level, the other is the same but with a<figure>
wrapper. Wouldn't it be more consistent and flexible to use the<figure>
wrapper on both blocks?Better yet, why not make them just one block and provide a block option variation like other blocks do?
Let's discuss!
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: