Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

无法解析CONCAT #1982

Closed
jayzch opened this issue Sep 18, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

无法解析CONCAT #1982

jayzch opened this issue Sep 18, 2017 · 7 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@jayzch
Copy link

jayzch commented Sep 18, 2017

在1.0.31版本下和1.1.3版本下均不能解析如下语句。
select ID, AUTHORITY_TYPE from t_authority a where authority_type like CONCAT('%', ?)
报错如下

Caused by: com.alibaba.druid.sql.parser.ParserException: ERROR. pos 209, line 1, column 203, token CONCAT
at com.alibaba.druid.sql.parser.SQLExprParser.primary(SQLExprParser.java:697)
at com.alibaba.druid.sql.parser.SQLExprParser.bitXor(SQLExprParser.java:133)
at com.alibaba.druid.sql.parser.SQLExprParser.multiplicative(SQLExprParser.java:213)
at com.alibaba.druid.sql.parser.SQLExprParser.additive(SQLExprParser.java:1577)

@wwyu8901
Copy link

我也遇到同样的问题,db2环境下。1.0.11版本是正常的,但是升级后就报concat解析错误了。试了一下最新的1.1也不行。

@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Sep 19, 2017

@jayzch 你的sql from前多了一个逗号吧

@jayzch
Copy link
Author

jayzch commented Sep 19, 2017

@wenshao 不是的。我只是粘贴的时候把无关查询字段删了

@jayzch
Copy link
Author

jayzch commented Sep 19, 2017

我们使用的时候,是用druid解析sql的特性,不是单纯使用连接池

@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Sep 19, 2017

问题已重现,会尽快发布新版本,可能在周末,也可能在国庆

@jayzch
Copy link
Author

jayzch commented Sep 23, 2017

求发

@wenshao wenshao added this to the 1.1.4 milestone Oct 3, 2017
@wenshao wenshao added the Bug label Oct 3, 2017
@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Oct 3, 2017

https://github.com/alibaba/druid/releases/tag/1.1.4
问题已经修复,请使用新版本

@wenshao wenshao closed this as completed Oct 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants