-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(Sagemaker) Allow Sagemaker Endpoint to be defined via L2 construct #20941
Conversation
Add SageMaker endpoint L2 construct to allow clients to define endpoint used to deploy and host models. RPC No.: 441
Update aws-sagemaker model version to 0.0.0 following cdk convention
…ppets in readme to be compiled
We require an approved RFC before we can review the PR for a new L2 Construct. Looks like you've opened a new issue for the RFC but not actually written the RFC or gotten approval. I'm marking this as a draft for now, but once the RFC has been approved and the relevant changes have been made to this PR, please mark it as ready for review. |
Thanks for your response @TheRealAmazonKendra, I missed the readme part in RFC process, will submit it for review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
The pull request linter fails with the following errors:
PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review. |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
11 similar comments
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
Closing this for staleness. However, @unavailablealfaa this construct is being actively worked on in #22886 and should be ready soon. |
Add SageMaker endpoint L2 construct to allow clients to define endpoint used to deploy and host models.
RPC: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#441
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
yarn integ
to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.yarn integ
without--dry-run
)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license