-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(lambda-python): add optional poetry bundling exclusion list parameter #23670
Merged
mergify
merged 8 commits into
aws:main
from
ryanandonian:feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
Feb 18, 2023
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
98a6fbb
feat(aws-lambda-python): support for poetry bundle asset exclusion list
ryanandonian 0449eef
fix bundle props to be correctly sent to bundler
ryanandonian 1b77de0
Merge branch 'main' into feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
ryanandonian 57ec161
Merge branch 'main' into feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
ryanandonian dc9dbb2
remove poetry-specific assetExcludes in favor of general assetExclude…
ryanandonian 405b72d
Merge branch 'main' into feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
ryanandonian 2ec7893
Merge branch 'main' into feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
TheRealAmazonKendra a37ea01
Merge branch 'main' into feat/aws-lambda-python-exclude-parameter-poetry
mergify[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason this should be scoped to
poetry
only and not just be calledassetExcludes
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, I was just trying to minimize the blast radius of this PR. But there is no real reason why this should be limited to
poetry
only. I can make the change to support all the packagers.Seems like there might be existing issues that this PR could help out with too #23313
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could definitely add support for that if you wanted, but this PR is also fine in its current scope 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just pushed some new changes moving it to just
assetExcludes
. I will definitely need help verifying and cleaning up these integration tests, that seemed to have had a bit more of an impact adding this to the other tests 👀