Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maybe allow a few more obvious shorthands for semver specs #49

Open
bitprophet opened this issue Apr 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Maybe allow a few more obvious shorthands for semver specs #49

bitprophet opened this issue Apr 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@bitprophet
Copy link
Owner

Spinoff of #45.

Noticed that e.g. in a situation where one puts out a minor release and major release at the same time, one doesn't actually want features in the minor to duplicate into the major all the time - it's implied the major will include them.

So, one wants to do e.g. (>=1.17,<2.0), explicitly. However, as it's a feature and thus only subject to landing in the one minor release bucket, one can more succinctly say (==1.17).

Thus this ticket is for making that even easier and perhaps allowing (1.17), i.e. the == is implicit. Not 100% sure, and assuming folks will only really want to use these syntaxes around (rare) major releases, it's not like we really need the savings. But noting just in case.

@bitprophet bitprophet modified the milestone: 1.2 Apr 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant