Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Interop hardfork #2095

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

SozinM
Copy link
Contributor

@SozinM SozinM commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 19, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2095 will not alter performance

Comparing NethermindEth:msozin/interop-hardfork (e99e88b) with main (c525b5e)

Summary

✅ 8 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Collaborator

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems fine, even if interop doens't have any evm changes we should probably still introduce a dedicated variant?

would remove a few todos in reth and unblock work on interop which sin't blocked by isthmus

Copy link
Member

@rakita rakita left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe LATEST would be better but I dont mind having INTEROP

@rakita rakita merged commit 03e3d8d into bluealloy:main Feb 21, 2025
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add op interop hardfork support
3 participants