Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Validation Interval should not be more frequent than Backup Interval #1971

Open
2 tasks done
shivansh02 opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2207
Open
2 tasks done

Validation Interval should not be more frequent than Backup Interval #1971

shivansh02 opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2207
Labels
good first issue Simple change to start learning code base priority:low Nice to have feature, minor improvement to functionality or usability type:enhancement Improvement of an existing function

Comments

@shivansh02
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

The Validate Interval QSpinBox in Schedule Tab allows me to set validation scheduling to be more frequent than the Backup Scheduling. For example I can set Backups to run every 6 weeks but set Validation to run every week.
Unless I'm reading the code wrong, doesn't validation using BorgCheckJob run only post-backup? Thus vorta shouldn't allow me to set Validation interval less than Backup interval.

Reproduction

  • I tried to reproduce the issue.
  • I was able to reproduce the issue.

OS

fedora 39

Version of Vorta

0.9.1

What did you install Vorta with?

Pip

Version of Borg

No response

Logs

No response
@shivansh02 shivansh02 changed the title Validation Interval more frequent than Backup Interval Validation Interval should not be more frequent than Backup Interval Mar 19, 2024
@diivi
Copy link
Contributor

diivi commented Mar 19, 2024

I can reproduce this, not sure if it is intentional.

@m3nu m3nu added priority:low Nice to have feature, minor improvement to functionality or usability type:enhancement Improvement of an existing function good first issue Simple change to start learning code base labels Apr 7, 2024
@VandalByte VandalByte linked a pull request Feb 16, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue Simple change to start learning code base priority:low Nice to have feature, minor improvement to functionality or usability type:enhancement Improvement of an existing function
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix for Validation Interval can be set more frequent than Backup Interval VandalByte/vorta
3 participants
@m3nu @diivi @shivansh02