You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After one nightmarish attempt to hand-reduce a fuzzer expression too many, I'm once again considering adding metadata to expressions. This'll take quite a bit of heavy lifting even for the basic approach of changing t to 'm t.
My current thought process is that, instead of putting metadata on every sub-expression, we'd instead have a carrier expression (similar to an implicit block) that would coat the wrapped expression in some metadata. (Maybe, eventually, we'd backform the statement system so that it does the same?)
Make type polymorphic
Add metadata carrier leg to expression
Devise some expression metadata tags
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After one nightmarish attempt to hand-reduce a fuzzer expression too many, I'm once again considering adding metadata to expressions. This'll take quite a bit of heavy lifting even for the basic approach of changing t to 'm t.
My current thought process is that, instead of putting metadata on every sub-expression, we'd instead have a carrier expression (similar to an implicit block) that would coat the wrapped expression in some metadata. (Maybe, eventually, we'd backform the statement system so that it does the same?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: