This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
Expose\test generic UnsafeQueueUserWorkItem overload #33637
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
src/System.Threading.ThreadPool/src/ApiCompatBaseline.netcoreappaot.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
Compat issues with assembly System.Threading.ThreadPool: | ||
MembersMustExist : Member 'System.Threading.ThreadPool.UnsafeQueueUserWorkItem<TState>(System.Action<TState>, TState, System.Boolean)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. |
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion
3
src/System.Threading.ThreadPool/src/ApiCompatBaseline.uapaot.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,2 @@ | ||
MembersMustExist : Member 'System.Threading.ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem<TState>(System.Action<TState>, TState, System.Boolean)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. | ||
MembersMustExist : Member 'System.Threading.ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem<TState>(System.Action<TState>, TState, System.Boolean)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. | ||
MembersMustExist : Member 'System.Threading.ThreadPool.UnsafeQueueUserWorkItem<TState>(System.Action<TState>, TState, System.Boolean)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible the queued work item can finish executing before executing this line? if so the following check can fail at that time in case of useunsafe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My guess is that the unsafe version would run in the default execution context, where the AsyncLocal would not exist, defaulting to a value of 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. There should not be a race condition here.