Call for Input: Editor Removal (@axic)

[SamWilsn]

Decision	Will we remove @axic as an EIP Editor?
Method	Unanimous (minus the Editor being removed)
Deadline	October 6, 2023

[SamWilsn]

In the interest of not having to wait the full 30 days, I am giving my opinion. Since I'm proposing these rather... rude calls for input, I'm going to abstain from all of them.

---

abstain.

[Pandapip1]

I vote no.

[SamWilsn]

I vote no.

@Pandapip1 may I ask why?

[Pandapip1]

@axic has a unique perspective. I find having a lot of different perspectives to be valuable, even though it necessarily slows down the process.

[SamWilsn]

I 100% value his contributions, but if he doesn't express his opinions on EIP governance related topics, I don't see why we should hold up every formal decision for 30 days.

[Pandapip1]

@SamWilsn convinced me to change. My vote is a "yes" if @axic does not respond in 7 days, a "no" as soon as he does respond, and an "abstain" in the meantime. If he is removed and wants to re-join, I would support him.

[g11tech]

I 100% value his contributions, but if he doesn't express his opinions on EIP governance related topics, I don't see why we should hold up every formal decision for 30 days.

+1 , would also support re-join

[Pandapip1]

My vote has now been updated to a "YES", until @axic responds before the CFI deadline.

[axic]

I'd like to stay, even if the environment has been adversarial causing in a decline of my motivation, I do hope to contribute in the near future.

[lightclient]

As long as @axic plans to stick around, I would like to support him as an editor.

[Pandapip1]

@axic I will change my vote to a "No." As per the most EIPIP meeting, we highly recommend you to delegate the voting power to either another editor or to an "abstain by default" social contract.

[g11tech]

changing vote to No as well

[lightclient]

no

[xinbenlv]

axic, you have authored many important EIPs and reviewed/edited many. Your skills and experience is a great asset to the group. While I understand you are driving a lot of time sensitive core development at the moment, if you could commit to stay and resume EIP editing soon I would personally be very supportive you stay.

[Pandapip1]

The deadline has passed, and the required votes have not been met. This can be closed.

[poojaranjan]

The proposal could not receive the required votes. @axic will continue to be an EIP Editor.