-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pros and cons of making the Foundation more transparent (Discussion) #921
Comments
I propose to stick to proposals in this repository. The way to write a proposal is outlined here https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1.md and the template |
I guess this falls into the category of a discussion starter on a potential Meta (Process) EIP, but I'm happy to move it if you can suggest a more appropriate place. |
@balazskonya Perhaps a better venue would be the Ethereum Magicians site that was recently setup, at least until there is a proper EIP written up. Once there is a proper EIP, it can be posted here for further critique. |
The foundation doesn't run the EIP process, and isn't governed by it; there's not much point writing an EIP about this. |
@balazskonya It does, but the EIP process is not the appropriate place to suggest changes to the foundation - EIPs are for changes to Ethereum, not to the Ethereum Foundation. |
Yes, I know. The only reason I created the issue here is that I couldn't find a better place for it, as I wrote it to the linked ethresear.ch topic.
Where would you raise an issue like this? |
Following up this issue, which was a follow-up to that question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: