Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pros and cons of making the Foundation more transparent (Discussion) #921

Closed
blaisekonya opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Comments

@blaisekonya
Copy link

Following up this issue, which was a follow-up to that question.

@nicksavers
Copy link
Contributor

nicksavers commented Mar 10, 2018

I propose to stick to proposals in this repository. The way to write a proposal is outlined here https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1.md and the template
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-X.md

@blaisekonya
Copy link
Author

Process EIPs are like Standards Track EIPs but apply to areas other than the Ethereum protocol itself.

Examples of appropriate public forums to gauge interest around your EIP include the Ethereum subreddit, the Issues section of this repository, and one of the Ethereum Gitter chat rooms. In particular, the Issues section of this repository is an excellent place to discuss your proposal with the community and start creating more formalized language around your EIP.

I guess this falls into the category of a discussion starter on a potential Meta (Process) EIP, but I'm happy to move it if you can suggest a more appropriate place.

@nateawelch
Copy link
Contributor

nateawelch commented Mar 12, 2018

@balazskonya Perhaps a better venue would be the Ethereum Magicians site that was recently setup, at least until there is a proper EIP written up. Once there is a proper EIP, it can be posted here for further critique.

@Arachnid
Copy link
Contributor

The foundation doesn't run the EIP process, and isn't governed by it; there's not much point writing an EIP about this.

@blaisekonya
Copy link
Author

@flygoing I'm aware of the FEM, but as I understand they're focusing on technical questions.
@Arachnid The Foundation indirectly supports the EIP process. IMO improving the operations of it would improve Ethereum too.

@Arachnid
Copy link
Contributor

@balazskonya It does, but the EIP process is not the appropriate place to suggest changes to the foundation - EIPs are for changes to Ethereum, not to the Ethereum Foundation.

@blaisekonya
Copy link
Author

Yes, I know. The only reason I created the issue here is that I couldn't find a better place for it, as I wrote it to the linked ethresear.ch topic.

I opened an issue in, for lack of a better place, the EIPs repo to start a discussion on it.

Where would you raise an issue like this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants