-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review of glycosylation branch (focus on protein glycosylation) #29770
Comments
The protein glycosylation children would need to be moved under glycoprotein biosynthetic process but before children term definitions need to be improved to avoid ambiguities (most are a description of a MF) and fit better with the literature classification:
Background The length and composition of glycans attached to proteins vary between species and often between cells and tissues. Reference:
1. Classification
They are also classified according to the 1st sugar that is covalently linked to the aa residue (the term usally cover not only the 1st sugar added but also the full glycan made).
2. Metabolism
2.2. catabolism of glycoproteins
|
This is an example showing why the current terms for protein glycosylation children are not straightforward to use. For example: This is the definition of the BP GO term that would fit the synthesis according to the literature classification:
However, the definition looks like it describes MF peptide-O-fucosyltransferase activity and could only be used to annotate O-fut1. Looking at the history of fng annotation shows that curators are confused how to use this GO term: |
Current tree with proposed changes:
New proposed tree:
@pgaudet it’s a lot of information but I thought it was important to see the whole branch to get an idea what potentially needs to be done. If people agree I will break it down into small manageable parts. |
Currently, it is difficult to understand how the glycosylation branch terms should be used for annotation as several of its terms represent one single MF.
It is also not clear how they fit with glycoprotein metabolic process and glycolipid metabolic process terms.
The way in which protein glycosylation children are organised as well as their definition is confusing.
Current trees:
Proposal:
Maybe rename it glycoRNA metabolic process?
The genes annotated to it could be instead annotated with glycolipid biosynthetic process (manual checking would be required)
the gene annotated to them would be better annotated to either glycoprotein biosynthetic process or glycolipid biosynthetic process terms
Related tickets:
#29735
#27105
#28977
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: