credProtect check in CTAP1 #629
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We accidentally lost this check in google#516. I refactored some of the filters for better style. The actual difference in logic is just one line in CTAP1 authenticate, everything else is style, a test and the order in which we convert and filter the credentials: ``` let credential_source = filter_listed_credential(credential_source, false) .ok_or(Ctap1StatusCode::SW_WRONG_DATA)?; ```
ia0
approved these changes
May 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We accidentally lost this check in #516. I refactored some of the filters for better style.
The actual difference in logic is just one line in CTAP1 authenticate, everything else is style, a test and the order in which we convert and filter the credentials: