You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
while using prover9 / mace4 together with TPTP language I found a bug in the tptp_to_ladr utility. If you put negation into an axiom directly before an existential quantifier than the axiom is not translated correctly.
For example:
fof(a, axiom, ( a <=> (~?[X]:(p(X))) )).
fof(b, axiom, ( b <=> ~(?[X]:(p(X))) )).
a <-> p(X) # label(a) # label(axiom).
b <-> -(exists X p(X)) # label(b) # label(axiom).
This repo seems to be dead but I put it here for other people who might experience the same problem.
V.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
while using prover9 / mace4 together with TPTP language I found a bug in the tptp_to_ladr utility. If you put negation into an axiom directly before an existential quantifier than the axiom is not translated correctly.
For example:
This repo seems to be dead but I put it here for other people who might experience the same problem.
V.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: