You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the the split in the archiveII dataset (fam-fold) is intra-family based. However, the paper claims that the fine-tuning on archiveII used an inter-family split.
Could the author clarify a bit about how the downloadable weights are fine-tuned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello 😄,
As stated in the paper: "The dataset of 3865 RNAs from nine families was split nine times, and in each split, a different family was held out for evaluation while the other eight families were used for training and validation."
I just tried out weights that were used for SRP family evaluation and results are as expected. Are you sure you are using the right weights? File rinalmo_giga_ss_archiveII-srp_ft.pt contains weights of the model trained (and validated) with all families except SRP.
I noticed that the the split in the archiveII dataset (
fam-fold
) is intra-family based. However, the paper claims that the fine-tuning on archiveII used an inter-family split.Could the author clarify a bit about how the downloadable weights are fine-tuned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: