Consistency of mplex and yamux settings

[mikevoronov]

At now, mplex and yamux have different naming in setting builder like
MplexConfig vs Config
max_num_subtreams vs set_max_num_substreams
max_buffer_size vs set_max_num_substreams

I think it would be convenient to have the same naming scheme for both mplex and yamux. And for me, yamux scheme looks more impressively.

[ericjmiller]

New to Rust, looking to contribute to libp2p.

It seems mplex is contained within rust-libp2p, while yamux is an external module whose API we don't control. Are you suggesting a change to yamux (here)?

[mxinden]

New to Rust, looking to contribute to libp2p.

@ericjmiller cool.

while yamux is an external module whose API we don't control.

Not quite. Yamux is an open source project in the sense that it welcomes comments and contributions, but as usual there is no guarantee for those suggestions to be included.

Are you suggesting a change to yamux (here)?

I would suggest changing the mplex implementation so that it matches the yamux naming scheme.