Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gcm analog needs to be simplified #89

Closed
dhruvbalwada opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #114
Closed

gcm analog needs to be simplified #89

dhruvbalwada opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #114

Comments

@dhruvbalwada
Copy link
Collaborator

At the moment the gcm-analogue.ipynb has some text in the last two sections that is irrelevant to the main message. This should be either deleted or incorporated somewhere -> I think the errors discussion needs to go to the key_aspects notebook and the stochastic discussion needs a seperate notebook (if it is self contained).

@dhruvbalwada
Copy link
Collaborator Author

  • I have now removed the last two sections (sources of error and stochastic parameterizations).
  • The important parts of sources of error have been added in part to the next notebook, gcm-parameterization-problem.
  • The part in gcm-parameterization-problem on sources of error has been removed, as it was just a long winded description of what was was present in gcm-analogue.
  • The stochastic parameterization part from gcm-analogue has been removed, as it was reaching an inconclusive finale.
  • If we need to reintroduce any of the removed parts at some later time this can be done, as the older version of both thees notebooks are kept as copies in the notebooks folder.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant