-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Run Experience #85759
Comments
One thing that might be worth mentioning is that there are two ways to "run" Python files with the Python extension. We have a "run Python file" command that basically calls the Python interpreter to run a file (and we recently added a run button to improve its discoverability for new users), and then the Start Without Debugging option. Right now there isn't a lot of confusion since not a lot of our users are aware of the start without debugging option, but once this is improved we may need to rethink the UX in the Python extension to avoid confusion. |
@luabud yes, aligning the "Run" stories of individual extensions is one goal covered by this item. |
Nothing planned here. |
As @weinand pointed out
Today VS Code does not support generic "Run" functionality!
What we currently support is the optional "noDebug" attribute of launch configurations:
VS Code's "Run" is basically the same as "Debug" but with a "noDebug": true added to the launch configuration.
VS Code does not know whether a debug adapter obeys the "noDebug" hint. So the VS Code debug UI will switch to debug mode and show a debug toolbar in any case.
To improve the Run experience we should:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: