Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comment status (Accepted or Rejected) #13181

Closed
bimalgeorge1 opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Comment status (Accepted or Rejected) #13181

bimalgeorge1 opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@bimalgeorge1
Copy link

bimalgeorge1 commented Apr 5, 2021

Attach (recommended) or Link to PDF file here:
ext-aconexwebservices-developersguide-150316-1448.pdf

Configuration:

  • Web browser and its version: Firefox 87.0 64 bit
  • Operating system and its version: Win 8.1
  • PDF.js version: v2.6.347
  • Is a browser extension: no

Steps to reproduce the problem:

  1. open a file add some comments and change the status to accept or reject
    2.open in PDF JS viewer it will not shows the status of the comment

What is the expected behavior? (add screenshot)
image

What went wrong? (add screenshot)
image

Link to a viewer (if hosted on a site other than mozilla.github.io/pdf.js or as Firefox/Chrome extension): mozilla.github.io/pdf.js

@Snuffleupagus
Copy link
Collaborator

Attach (recommended) or Link to PDF file here:
ext-aconexwebservices-developersguide-150316-1448.pdf
[,..]
What went wrong? (add screenshot)

The screen-shot doesn't seem to agree with the PDF document linked above, which makes part more confusing than helpful.


This looks, for all intents and purposes, like a duplicate of #10982

@bimalgeorge1
Copy link
Author

Attach (recommended) or Link to PDF file here:
ext-aconexwebservices-developersguide-150316-1448.pdf
[,..]
What went wrong? (add screenshot)

The screen-shot doesn't seem to agree with the PDF document linked above, which makes part more confusing than helpful.

This looks, for all intents and purposes, like a duplicate of #10982

sorry for the inconvenience. i am updated the post .

@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

This is indeed a duplicate of #10982.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants