-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 628
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Preserve custom element tags #952
Open
ras0q
wants to merge
1
commit into
mozilla:main
Choose a base branch
from
ras0q:feat/tags-to-preserve
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The naming of this is modeled on
classesToPreserve
, which functions as an allowlist for classes that are then not removed from the output (otherwise, all class information is removed).From that, and from the documentation, and from the ticket you filed ("which can result in the loss of important semantic information and custom function") I would expect this new property to ensure that the content in these custom tags is always preserved. But the patch does not do that, it only scores those elements and they may yet get rejected if their score is too low.
So I think either the patch behaviour needs to be changed (so the tags always stay part of the output, which I suspect is non-trivial to organize), or the documentation/explanation/labeling of the property needs to be changed so that it matches the behaviour. Maybe calling it
additionalTagsToScore
would be better?Finally, if you keep the current implementation (but perhaps rename the property), if we need to create a list of scorable tag names let's not do it on every iteration inside this loop, as that is expensive and this loop is hot (performance-sensitive) code.