Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Use custom frozen lockfile check #16677

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2019
Merged

Conversation

eps1lon
Copy link
Member

@eps1lon eps1lon commented Jul 22, 2019

Frozen lockfile was used to prevent yarn from regenerating some git dependency of dtslint. By only running it in CI we risked integrating lockfiles that change on the initial install (bad 1st contribute experience) so we added it by default.

However the working with the flag enabled is a bit cumbersome. Since we already have a check in CI against integrating outdated lockfiles (git diff after yarn) we don't need it anyway.

Since none of the active core contributers had a problem with running yarn without frozen-lockfile we can remove it. Need to properly debug the issue the next time it gets reported instead of blindly accepting fixes. It's important to boost productivity for the people that work the most on the workspace.

@eps1lon eps1lon added the test label Jul 22, 2019
@eps1lon eps1lon marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2019 11:00
@mui-pr-bot
Copy link

mui-pr-bot commented Jul 22, 2019

No bundle size changes comparing 1b9d5cb...57b835b

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 57b835b

@eps1lon eps1lon force-pushed the ci/no-frozen-lockfile branch from ddfc6b0 to 6812981 Compare July 22, 2019 11:32
Copy link
Member

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants