Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confirm dependent elections #1441

Closed
rkeene opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Confirm dependent elections #1441

rkeene opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement high effort remaining major This item indicates the need for or supplies a major or notable change

Comments

@rkeene
Copy link
Contributor

rkeene commented Dec 12, 2018

After merging #1303 we can improve confirm_back() as noted in #1438

@rkeene rkeene added enhancement major This item indicates the need for or supplies a major or notable change labels Dec 12, 2018
@rkeene rkeene added this to the V18.0 milestone Dec 12, 2018
@zhyatt zhyatt modified the milestones: V18.0, V19.0 Jan 8, 2019
@zhyatt zhyatt assigned cryptocode and unassigned rkeene Feb 12, 2019
@cryptocode
Copy link
Contributor

Depends on the confirmation height rewrite. It may make sense to bake this into that PR. Will coordinate with Wesley.

@cryptocode
Copy link
Contributor

#1801 replaces confirm_back with adding confirmation height.

@zhyatt zhyatt removed this from the V19.0 milestone Mar 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement high effort remaining major This item indicates the need for or supplies a major or notable change
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants