Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommendations for Configurable Parameters #117

Open
hawkinsw opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Recommendations for Configurable Parameters #117

hawkinsw opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hawkinsw
Copy link
Member

hawkinsw commented Jan 8, 2025

As stated in Section 10 P6 (of the -5 draft),

The current specification of the Responsiveness Test includes a number of configurable parameters. If we want the Responsiveness Test to produce a score that can be compared meaningfully between different hardware and different network operators, we need to specify required values for these configurable parameters. For engineering diagnostic purposes different parameter values may be useful, but for comparisons between vendors or operators we need IETF consensus on fixed standardized test parameters that everyone uses.

I know that IANA tracks registrations for many things, but I was wondering if there is a registration for test parameters? If so, should we decide on the recommended values for the parameters and submit to that registry? If not, it still seems like it would be a good to follow up on the recommendation in the final sentence.

I am happy to do the work! I just wanted to get feedback first!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants