Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more prominently document existing scheme for uncertainties #370

Closed
zjttoefs opened this issue Jan 21, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

more prominently document existing scheme for uncertainties #370

zjttoefs opened this issue Jan 21, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@zjttoefs
Copy link
Contributor

There is a _fieldname__errors way of adding uncertainties to arbitrary fields defined at least within NXdata. That could be generalised, but should be more widely known anyway.

@prjemian
Copy link
Contributor

It was decided at NIAC2010 that the uncertainties attribute be added to all fields, by adding it under fieldType in nxdl.xsd

Show a simple example from https://github.com/canSAS-org/NXcanSAS_examples

@prjemian
Copy link
Contributor

copy (and modify) definition of @uncertainties from #516

@prjemian
Copy link
Contributor

done with #685

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants