-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release procedure changes & nominating @sam-github and @jasnell as releasers #2416
Comments
should have mentioned @nodejs/tsc for this one, sorry |
I'm happy to accept assuming their are no objections. GPG key can be found here: https://keybase.io/jasnell |
Sounds like a good plan. +1 |
👍 |
I'm happy to help out with releases, gpg keys at https://keybase.io/octetcloud |
I may need to add a new gpg key (likely my keybase one), I erased my old one when switching laptops. |
@chrisdickinson can you confirm https://keybase.io/chrisdickinson / I'll do this in a single PR. |
err, |
this was voted on by the TSC today and both additions got a +1 and there were no objections to the plan to mush together a release team for all branches |
Can this be closed then? Or is it also for this week's? |
waiting for feedback and signoff on #2455, I'll remove the label though |
Fixes: nodejs#2416 PR-URL: nodejs#2455 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Fixes: #2416 PR-URL: #2455 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Closing since #2455 landed. |
I'm proposing that we fully unify the release process for 0.10, 0.12, io.js, 4.x+ and LTS. Initially I thought that having separate groups for different concerns was the way to go but now I think that's over-optimising and we should just reduce friction and let people gravitate towards the release lines that they are more concerned with—if we have a big enough group of releasers then we should be covered. I also think our current procedures for getting sign-off via GitHub is suffice to stop any unwanted changes getting out into LTS & Maintainence where we need to take much more care.
Current status:
I propose that we:
Relevant docs on how it's currently handled:
Tagging this as
tsc-agenda
because it'll need formal sign-off. @sam-github and @jasnell may choose to decline, and all of this is up for discussion by collaborators as well of course.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: