Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[User Story] - notation verify - remote artifacts #41

Closed
2 tasks done
iamsamirzon opened this issue Oct 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

[User Story] - notation verify - remote artifacts #41

iamsamirzon opened this issue Oct 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request epic new work which requires one or more features, tasks, or issues to complete. User Story
Milestone

Comments

@iamsamirzon
Copy link
Contributor

iamsamirzon commented Oct 11, 2021

As a verifier, I want to verify remote artifact integrity with remote signatures using my local trust policy and store.

Note: verify with local key, verify remote artifacts. Verify local artifacts out of scope RC-1.

Implementation items to complete story:

@iamsamirzon
Copy link
Contributor Author

iamsamirzon commented Jul 13, 2022

@dtzar - This implementation work is blocked on the CLI spec ( #36) being finalized for RC-1
@shizhMSFT - Assigning this to you to align with the allocation in the spreadsheet.

@iamsamirzon iamsamirzon moved this from Todo to In Progress in Notary Project Planning Board Jul 13, 2022
@iamsamirzon iamsamirzon moved this from In Progress to Todo in Notary Project Planning Board Jul 13, 2022
@dtzar dtzar changed the title CLI Cmds for Verification [User Story] - notation verify - remote artifacts Aug 3, 2022
@dtzar dtzar added enhancement New feature or request User Story epic new work which requires one or more features, tasks, or issues to complete. and removed good first issue Good for newcomers roadmap notation-CLI labels Aug 3, 2022
@yizha1
Copy link
Contributor

yizha1 commented Sep 2, 2022

Covered by issue #38 as well

@iamsamirzon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yizha1 - #38 is related, but we need to separately track them. This item focusses on the experience of using the "Verify" workflow/command. The #38 is for how we configure the pre-requisite of trust store and trust policy.

cc: @vaninrao10

@yizha1 yizha1 moved this from Todo to In Progress in Notary Project Planning Board Sep 13, 2022
@yizha1 yizha1 moved this from In Progress to Todo in Notary Project Planning Board Sep 13, 2022
@yizha1 yizha1 moved this from Todo to In Progress in Notary Project Planning Board Sep 21, 2022
@patrickzheng200 patrickzheng200 moved this from In Progress to PR Review in Notary Project Planning Board Oct 26, 2022
@yizha1 yizha1 moved this from PR Review to Done in Notary Project Planning Board Nov 2, 2022
@yizha1
Copy link
Contributor

yizha1 commented Nov 4, 2022

Close as completed.

@yizha1 yizha1 closed this as completed Nov 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request epic new work which requires one or more features, tasks, or issues to complete. User Story
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants