-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration of omec-project UPF's BESS data plane inside PacketRusher #749
Comments
Hi Valentin, thanks for your comment. If I correctly understand your proposal for using |
Hi @gab-arrobo, Thanks for your quick answer! PacketRusher is a bit similar to your gnbSim tool, but supports more procedures and can do UE registration in parallel, I hope we can collaborate together :-) I'll join your slack as well! Thanks a lot, |
Hi @gab-arrobo, As I'm working on this project as an individual on my free time, my email domain is not listed as one of the domains that can be used to sign up on the ONF-Community's Slack, what should I do? Thanks a lot, |
Let me check with the infra team. Are you trying to use the email from your GitHub profile? |
Yes exactly, thanks a lot @gab-arrobo! |
I added you to the |
Hi @gab-arrobo Sorry for disturbing you. My email addr: [email protected] Thank you. |
Have you tried joining through onf-community.slack.com? |
@gab-arrobo |
Ok, thanks for the info. Let me check |
Done. You were added to a few channels in the ONF community |
Hi @linouxis9, Let's move this conversation to Slack (probably the Thanks! |
Hi,
I'm currently working on an open-source gNB/UE Simulator which can act as 5G Core stress tester to evaluate the performance of the 5G Core, called PacketRusher.
It can stress test a 5G Core both on the control plane and user plane side using a great amount of UEs.
For now, I've been using free5gc's gtp5g kernel module as the GTP-U stack of the tool. However, kernel modules have a lot of shortcomings and I've been looking to replace the GTP-U stack with something else.
Lately, I've been working on integrating eUPF's eBPF code inside HewlettPackard/PacketRusher#47.
However, as PacketRusher is to be a performance-testing tool, I'm interested in also offering something more performant.
As such, I would be interested in integrating your BESS data plane inside PacketRusher.
Do you think it would make sense for a tool like PacketRusher to embed it, eg. PacketRusher would configure PFCP Sessions inside the BESS dataplane to act as a RAN and send traffic toward the 5GC's UPF?
Sorry for the long message :-)
Thanks and cheers,
Valentin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: