You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a recent PR, I've removed the -j(NUM_JOBS) because it crashed my virtual machine.
Unfortunately, generation of Verilator model is wayyyy slower...
Should I put it back in a new PR ? (I'll use NUM_JOBS=2 or 4 on my clone)
It may imply as well a short modification of the Readme when we perform make verilate ("you can use NUM_JOBS=$(nproc)" or something similar).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pcotret
added
the
Type:Bug
For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system
label
Sep 8, 2023
zarubaf
added
Status:Stale
Issue or PR is stale and hasn't received any updates.
and removed
Type:Bug
For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system
labels
Oct 23, 2023
One possible improvement is to remove the -O3 option passed to Verilator. According to VL documentation it mainly applies inlining and this may significantly slow down C++ compilation.
Is there an existing CVA6 bug for this?
Bug Description
In a recent PR, I've removed the
-j(NUM_JOBS)
because it crashed my virtual machine.Unfortunately, generation of Verilator model is wayyyy slower...
Should I put it back in a new PR ? (I'll use NUM_JOBS=2 or 4 on my clone)
It may imply as well a short modification of the Readme when we perform
make verilate
("you can use NUM_JOBS=$(nproc)" or something similar).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: