You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For annotation types like the following it would make sense to also include the element default value in the type tables, as the compiler validates that the annotations provide a value for all elements without defaults. Thus if the parser warnings are enabled, there will be warnings logged when compiling against type tables.
More importantly, the values will be missing in the LST type attribution (cf. JavaType.Annotation), which in turn means that downstream recipes won't be able to act on any element default values.
For annotation types like the following it would make sense to also include the element default value in the type tables, as the compiler validates that the annotations provide a value for all elements without defaults. Thus if the parser warnings are enabled, there will be warnings logged when compiling against type tables.
More importantly, the values will be missing in the LST type attribution (cf.
JavaType.Annotation
), which in turn means that downstream recipes won't be able to act on any element default values.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: