-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix split materials,Complete the npm information of the component.json file #1154
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes modify the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant SM as splitMaterials
participant C as Component
participant P as Packages Array
SM->>C: Process each component
alt Component has npm field
SM->>P: Look up matching package for component.npm.package
alt Matching package found
SM->>C: For keys (version, destructuring, script, css), update missing fields from package
end
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs (4)
41-49
: Missing semicolon in conditional blockThe implementation correctly completes the npm field information by finding matching packages and populating missing fields. However, there's a missing semicolon after the conditional statement.
if (comp.npm[e] === undefined && pack[e]) - comp.npm[e] = pack[e] + comp.npm[e] = pack[e];
42-49
: Add null check for packages arrayThe code assumes that the
packages
array will always exist. It would be good practice to add a check to ensure the code doesn't crash ifpackages
is undefined or null.// 补全组件的npm 字段 + if (!packages || !Array.isArray(packages)) return; const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package); if (pack && comp.npm) { const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css']; complete.forEach(e => { if (comp.npm[e] === undefined && pack[e]) comp.npm[e] = pack[e] }) }
41-42
: Improve code documentationConsider adding more detailed comments to explain the purpose and functionality of this npm field completion code block. This will make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of these changes.
- // 补全组件的npm 字段 + // 补全组件的npm字段 + // Complete the npm fields (version, destructuring, script, css) for each component + // by finding matching package information from the packages array const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
46-47
: Consider handling null valuesThe condition only checks if the field is
undefined
, but it might be good to also handlenull
values.- if (comp.npm[e] === undefined && pack[e]) + if ((comp.npm[e] === undefined || comp.npm[e] === null) && pack[e]) comp.npm[e] = pack[e]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs (1)
12-12
: Good addition to extract packages dataThe addition of extracting the
packages
property frombundle.data.materials
is necessary for the new functionality to complete npm information.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
分离build.json文件中的组件时,补全组件信息中的npm字段信息内容
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit