Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[subsystem-benchmark] Add approval-voting benchmark to CI #4216

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions .gitlab/pipeline/publish.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ publish-subsystem-benchmarks:
artifacts: true
- job: subsystem-benchmark-availability-distribution
artifacts: true
- job: subsystem-benchmark-approval-voting
artifacts: true
- job: publish-rustdoc
artifacts: false
script:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -115,6 +117,8 @@ trigger_workflow:
artifacts: true
- job: subsystem-benchmark-availability-distribution
artifacts: true
- job: subsystem-benchmark-approval-voting
artifacts: true
script:
- echo "Triggering workflow"
- >
Expand Down
30 changes: 15 additions & 15 deletions .gitlab/pipeline/test.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ test-syscalls:
fi
allow_failure: false # this rarely triggers in practice

subsystem-benchmark-availability-recovery:
.subsystem-benchmark-template:
stage: test
artifacts:
name: "${CI_JOB_NAME}_${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}"
Expand All @@ -523,26 +523,26 @@ subsystem-benchmark-availability-recovery:
- .docker-env
- .common-refs
- .run-immediately
script:
- cargo bench -p polkadot-availability-recovery --bench availability-recovery-regression-bench --features subsystem-benchmarks
tags:
- benchmark

subsystem-benchmark-availability-recovery:
extends:
- .subsystem-benchmark-template
script:
- cargo bench -p polkadot-availability-recovery --bench availability-recovery-regression-bench --features subsystem-benchmarks
allow_failure: true

subsystem-benchmark-availability-distribution:
stage: test
artifacts:
name: "${CI_JOB_NAME}_${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}"
when: always
expire_in: 1 hour
paths:
- charts/
extends:
- .docker-env
- .common-refs
- .run-immediately
- .subsystem-benchmark-template
script:
- cargo bench -p polkadot-availability-distribution --bench availability-distribution-regression-bench --features subsystem-benchmarks
tags:
- benchmark
allow_failure: true

subsystem-benchmark-approval-voting:
extends:
- .subsystem-benchmark-template
script:
- cargo bench -p polkadot-node-core-approval-voting --bench approval-voting-regression-bench --features subsystem-benchmarks
allow_failure: true
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Cargo.lock

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/Cargo.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,3 +53,14 @@ kvdb-memorydb = "0.13.0"
test-helpers = { package = "polkadot-primitives-test-helpers", path = "../../../primitives/test-helpers" }
log = { workspace = true, default-features = true }
env_logger = "0.11"

polkadot-subsystem-bench = { path = "../../subsystem-bench" }

[[bench]]
name = "approval-voting-regression-bench"
path = "benches/approval-voting-regression-bench.rs"
harness = false
required-features = ["subsystem-benchmarks"]

[features]
subsystem-benchmarks = []
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Polkadot.

// Polkadot is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.

// Polkadot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.

// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Polkadot. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

// TODO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any TODO left ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it shouldn't be.

//! availability-read regression tests
//!
//! Availability read benchmark based on Kusama parameters and scale.
//!
//! Subsystems involved:
//! - availability-distribution
//! - bitfield-distribution
//! - availability-store

use polkadot_subsystem_bench::{
self,
approval::{bench_approvals, prepare_test, ApprovalsOptions},
configuration::TestConfiguration,
usage::BenchmarkUsage,
utils::save_to_file,
};
use std::io::Write;

const BENCH_COUNT: usize = 10;

fn main() -> Result<(), String> {
let mut messages = vec![];
let mut config = TestConfiguration::default();
// A single node effort roughly
config.n_cores = 100;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we approving 100 candidates per block ? If so, then the comment above is not correct.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this would generate assignments and approvals for 100 occupied core each block

config.n_validators = 500;
config.num_blocks = 10;
config.peer_bandwidth = 524288000000;
config.bandwidth = 524288000000;
config.latency = None;
config.connectivity = 100;
config.generate_pov_sizes();
let options = ApprovalsOptions {
last_considered_tranche: 89,
coalesce_mean: 3.0,
coalesce_std_dev: 1.0,
coalesce_tranche_diff: 12,
enable_assignments_v2: true,
stop_when_approved: false,
workdir_prefix: "/tmp".to_string(),
num_no_shows_per_candidate: 0,
};

println!("Benchmarking...");
let usages: Vec<BenchmarkUsage> = (0..BENCH_COUNT)
.map(|n| {
print!("\r[{}{}]", "#".repeat(n), "_".repeat(BENCH_COUNT - n));
std::io::stdout().flush().unwrap();
let (mut env, state) = prepare_test(config.clone(), options.clone(), false);
env.runtime().block_on(bench_approvals("approvals_throughput", &mut env, state))
})
.collect();
println!("\rDone!{}", " ".repeat(BENCH_COUNT));

let average_usage = BenchmarkUsage::average(&usages);
save_to_file(
"charts/availability-distribution-regression-bench.json",
average_usage.to_chart_json().map_err(|e| e.to_string())?,
)
.map_err(|e| e.to_string())?;
println!("{}", average_usage);

// We expect no variance for received and sent
// but use 0.001 because we operate with floats
messages.extend(average_usage.check_network_usage(&[
("Received from peers", 52944.7000, 0.001),
("Sent to peers", 63532.2000, 0.001),
]));
messages.extend(average_usage.check_cpu_usage(&[
("approval-distribution", 5.9513, 0.1),
("approval-voting", 7.8114, 0.1),
]));

if messages.is_empty() {
Ok(())
} else {
eprintln!("{}", messages.join("\n"));
Err("Regressions found".to_string())
}
}
Loading