Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

【OpenApiDoc】auth和client中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 #635

Closed
onecer opened this issue Sep 6, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #665
Closed

【OpenApiDoc】auth和client中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 #635

onecer opened this issue Sep 6, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #665
Labels
console polaris console issues documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@onecer
Copy link
Contributor

onecer commented Sep 6, 2022

What is the feature you want to add?

基于现有的框架,为httpserver中的各个http方法提供 openapi doc文档描述

Why do you want to add this feature?

优化北极星的OpenAPI文档,更方便用户进行接口测试
How to implement this feature?

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@onecer onecer added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 6, 2022
@onecer onecer changed the title OpenApiDoc】config_console_access中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 【OpenApiDoc】config_console_access中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 Sep 6, 2022
@onecer onecer changed the title 【OpenApiDoc】config_console_access中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 【OpenApiDoc】auth和client中的http接口添加Swagger的描述 Sep 6, 2022
@chuntaojun chuntaojun added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers console polaris console issues labels Sep 6, 2022
@onecer
Copy link
Contributor Author

onecer commented Sep 14, 2022

assign to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
console polaris console issues documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants