False negatives for implicit string concatenation

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Current problem

The following code:

print("Lorem ipsum " "dolor sit amet")

Could be rewritten:

print("Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet")

But

print(
    "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,"
    " sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore "
    "magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud "
    "exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea "
)

Should not, because the implicit string concatenation is not useless as removing it would make the line go over the max line length.

Desired solution

Raise implicit-str-concat in this situation.

Additional context

pylint-dev/astroid#1525 (comment)

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

A decision was made in fcc0151 to not raise implicit-str-concat on function call, I don't understand the rationale.

[cdce8p]

A decision was made in fcc0151 to not raise implicit-str-concat on function call, I don't understand the rationale.

Saw this comment about it: #1655 (comment)

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

We have the option check-str-concat-over-line-jump to handle multi line implicit str concat though, the example in this comment would be treated well. Also I think I have a good example of a call being faulty if you consider:

with open("file.txt" "r", encoding="utf8") as f:
    content = f.read()

print is a bad example as the implicit str concat happens anyway.

Also seeing #1655 (comment) I think not including calls is an oversight too.