-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(web): exclude czml & kml for the default layer style #1217
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the introduction of a new utility function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🔇 Additional comments (2)web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (2)
The import statement is well-placed and follows the project's import organization pattern.
The changes correctly delegate the layer style processing to the utility function, which can handle the CZML & KML format exclusion. The implementation uses proper null safety through optional chaining. Let's verify the layer style utility implementation: ✅ Verification successfulThe implementation seems incomplete as the output was cut off. Let me gather more context about the layer style utility implementation. Let me check the default style and type definitions to complete the verification. Layer style utility correctly handles CZML & KML format exclusion The implementation in
The code aligns perfectly with the PR objective of excluding CZML & KML formats from layer styling. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the layer style utility implementation
# Expected: The utility should handle CZML & KML format exclusion
# Check the implementation of getLayerStyleValue
echo "Checking getLayerStyleValue implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export.*getLayerStyleValue" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"
# Look for tests
echo "Checking for related tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx layer-style
Length of output: 668 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation with more context lines
rg -A 20 "export.*getLayerStyleValue" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"
# Search for CZML/KML handling in the same file
echo "Checking CZML/KML format handling..."
rg -i "czml|kml" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"
# Look for type definitions
echo "Checking type definitions..."
rg "type LayerAppearanceTypes" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -A 5
Length of output: 890 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the default style definition
echo "Checking default style..."
rg "defaultStyle" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -B 5
# Check LayerStyle type definition
echo "Checking LayerStyle type..."
rg "type LayerStyle" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -A 5
# Check imports and exports
echo "Checking imports and exports..."
rg "^(import|export)" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"
Length of output: 891 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (1)
5-18
: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.The function would benefit from comprehensive documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and return value.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Retrieves the style value for a layer, with special handling for CZML and KML formats. + * @param layerStyles - Array of layer styles + * @param id - Optional layer identifier to match + * @param type - Optional layer type (e.g., "czml", "kml") + * @returns Layer appearance configuration or empty object for CZML/KML + */ export const getLayerStyleValue = (web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (1)
63-67
: Consider adding documentation for format-specific style handlingTo improve maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining which formats (like CZML and KML) are excluded from default styling and why.
+ // Skip default layer style for formats with built-in styling (e.g., CZML, KML) const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue( layerStyles, nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId, (nlsLayer.config?.data?.type ?? "").toLowerCase() );
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (1)
392-396
: Consider adding type validation for better robustness.The change correctly implements the PR objective by passing the layer data type to
getLayerStyleValue
. However, consider these improvements for better robustness:Consider this safer implementation:
- const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue( - layerStyles, - nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId, - (nlsLayer.config?.data?.type ?? "").toLowerCase() - ); + const layerDataType = nlsLayer.config?.data?.type; + const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue( + layerStyles, + nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId, + typeof layerDataType === "string" ? layerDataType.toLowerCase() : "" + );This change:
- Improves readability by extracting the type to a variable
- Adds type validation before calling
toLowerCase()
- Provides a safe default when type is undefined
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts
(2 hunks)web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts
(2 hunks)web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (2)
1-3
: LGTM! Imports are well-structured and necessary.
All imports are relevant to the function's implementation and use absolute paths consistently.
5-18
: Verify the impact on existing layer styles.
The function correctly implements the PR objective by excluding CZML and KML from default styling. However, we should verify that this doesn't affect other layer types unexpectedly.
web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Good modularization of layer style logic
Moving the layer style retrieval logic to a separate utility module improves code organization and reusability.
63-67
: Verify CZML and KML format handling
The implementation looks good for filtering layer styles based on data type. However, let's verify that CZML and KML formats are properly excluded.
✅ Verification successful
CZML and KML formats are properly excluded via empty style object
The verification confirms that CZML and KML formats are properly handled in web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts
:
if (type === "czml" || type === "kml") return {};
This implementation correctly excludes these formats by returning an empty style object, which aligns with the PR's objective.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CZML/KML handling in layer styles
# Test 1: Check if there are any CZML/KML specific handling in the layer-style utility
echo "Checking layer-style utility implementation:"
rg -i "czml|kml" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"
# Test 2: Look for any test cases related to CZML/KML handling
echo "Checking for related test cases:"
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg -i "czml|kml"
Length of output: 330
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (1)
15-15
: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed.
The import statement for getLayerStyleValue
follows the project's conventions and is appropriately grouped with other utility imports.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1217 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 13.85% 18.58% +4.72%
==========================================
Files 595 602 +7
Lines 64056 66161 +2105
Branches 660 606 -54
==========================================
+ Hits 8873 12293 +3420
+ Misses 55183 53868 -1315
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Overview
CZML & KML supports define styles by themselves, we should exclude them when try applying default layer style.
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit