Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(web): exclude czml & kml for the default layer style #1217

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

airslice
Copy link
Contributor

@airslice airslice commented Nov 1, 2024

Overview

CZML & KML supports define styles by themselves, we should exclude them when try applying default layer style.

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a utility function for enhanced layer style retrieval, improving flexibility in handling different layer configurations.
  • Improvements
    • Updated the processing logic for layers to utilize the new utility function, streamlining the handling of layer styles.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed outdated inline functions to simplify code and reduce potential errors in layer style processing.

@airslice airslice requested a review from mkumbobeaty as a code owner November 1, 2024 04:15
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve the introduction of a new utility function getLayerStyleValue in layer-style.ts, which centralizes the retrieval of layer styles. The processLayers function in both convert.ts and convert-new-property.ts has been updated to utilize this new function, enhancing the way layer styles are processed by allowing additional parameters for more flexible retrieval. The overall structure of the widget processing logic remains unchanged, with a focus on improving code modularity and clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts Updated processLayers to use getLayerStyleValue for layer style retrieval with new parameters. Removed inline function.
web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts Modified processLayers to invoke getLayerStyleValue, enhancing layer style handling. Import of defaultStyle removed.
web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts Introduced getLayerStyleValue function to retrieve layer styles based on specified parameters.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

server

Suggested reviewers

  • mkumbobeaty
  • pyshx

Poem

In the code where layers play,
A new style finds its way.
With functions neat and clear,
We fetch styles without fear.
A hop, a skip, a jump so bright,
Our layers shine with pure delight! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfd06e3 and 7880355.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (2 hunks)
  • web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (2 hunks)
  • web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts
  • web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (2)

15-15: LGTM: Clean import addition

The import statement is well-placed and follows the project's import organization pattern.


392-396: LGTM: Layer style handling aligns with PR objective

The changes correctly delegate the layer style processing to the utility function, which can handle the CZML & KML format exclusion. The implementation uses proper null safety through optional chaining.

Let's verify the layer style utility implementation:

✅ Verification successful

The implementation seems incomplete as the output was cut off. Let me gather more context about the layer style utility implementation.


Let me check the default style and type definitions to complete the verification.


Layer style utility correctly handles CZML & KML format exclusion

The implementation in getLayerStyleValue properly handles the format exclusion:

  • Returns an empty object {} for CZML & KML formats
  • Returns the found layer style value for other formats if available
  • Falls back to default style for other formats when no style is found

The code aligns perfectly with the PR objective of excluding CZML & KML formats from layer styling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the layer style utility implementation
# Expected: The utility should handle CZML & KML format exclusion

# Check the implementation of getLayerStyleValue
echo "Checking getLayerStyleValue implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export.*getLayerStyleValue" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"

# Look for tests
echo "Checking for related tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx layer-style

Length of output: 668


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation with more context lines
rg -A 20 "export.*getLayerStyleValue" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"

# Search for CZML/KML handling in the same file
echo "Checking CZML/KML format handling..."
rg -i "czml|kml" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"

# Look for type definitions
echo "Checking type definitions..."
rg "type LayerAppearanceTypes" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -A 5

Length of output: 890


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the default style definition
echo "Checking default style..."
rg "defaultStyle" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -B 5

# Check LayerStyle type definition
echo "Checking LayerStyle type..."
rg "type LayerStyle" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts" -A 5

# Check imports and exports
echo "Checking imports and exports..."
rg "^(import|export)" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"

Length of output: 891


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7880355
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-web/deploys/672457aee8ef0100086bf20e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1217--reearth-web.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (1)

5-18: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.

The function would benefit from comprehensive documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and return value.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Retrieves the style value for a layer, with special handling for CZML and KML formats.
+ * @param layerStyles - Array of layer styles
+ * @param id - Optional layer identifier to match
+ * @param type - Optional layer type (e.g., "czml", "kml")
+ * @returns Layer appearance configuration or empty object for CZML/KML
+ */
 export const getLayerStyleValue = (
web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (1)

63-67: Consider adding documentation for format-specific style handling

To improve maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining which formats (like CZML and KML) are excluded from default styling and why.

+    // Skip default layer style for formats with built-in styling (e.g., CZML, KML)
     const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue(
       layerStyles,
       nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId,
       (nlsLayer.config?.data?.type ?? "").toLowerCase()
     );
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (1)

392-396: Consider adding type validation for better robustness.

The change correctly implements the PR objective by passing the layer data type to getLayerStyleValue. However, consider these improvements for better robustness:

Consider this safer implementation:

-    const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue(
-      layerStyles,
-      nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId,
-      (nlsLayer.config?.data?.type ?? "").toLowerCase()
-    );
+    const layerDataType = nlsLayer.config?.data?.type;
+    const layerStyle = getLayerStyleValue(
+      layerStyles,
+      nlsLayer.config?.layerStyleId,
+      typeof layerDataType === "string" ? layerDataType.toLowerCase() : ""
+    );

This change:

  1. Improves readability by extracting the type to a variable
  2. Adds type validation before calling toLowerCase()
  3. Provides a safe default when type is undefined
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15b0171 and cfd06e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (2 hunks)
  • web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (2 hunks)
  • web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts (2)

1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-structured and necessary.

All imports are relevant to the function's implementation and use absolute paths consistently.


5-18: Verify the impact on existing layer styles.

The function correctly implements the PR objective by excluding CZML and KML from default styling. However, we should verify that this doesn't affect other layer types unexpectedly.

web/src/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts (2)

2-2: LGTM: Good modularization of layer style logic

Moving the layer style retrieval logic to a separate utility module improves code organization and reusability.


63-67: Verify CZML and KML format handling

The implementation looks good for filtering layer styles based on data type. However, let's verify that CZML and KML formats are properly excluded.

✅ Verification successful

CZML and KML formats are properly excluded via empty style object

The verification confirms that CZML and KML formats are properly handled in web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts:

if (type === "czml" || type === "kml") return {};

This implementation correctly excludes these formats by returning an empty style object, which aligns with the PR's objective.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CZML/KML handling in layer styles
# Test 1: Check if there are any CZML/KML specific handling in the layer-style utility
echo "Checking layer-style utility implementation:"
rg -i "czml|kml" "web/src/beta/utils/layer-style.ts"

# Test 2: Look for any test cases related to CZML/KML handling
echo "Checking for related test cases:"
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg -i "czml|kml"

Length of output: 330

web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts (1)

15-15: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed.

The import statement for getLayerStyleValue follows the project's conventions and is appropriately grouped with other utility imports.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 18.58%. Comparing base (e33d88e) to head (cfd06e3).
Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rc/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1217      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   13.85%   18.58%   +4.72%     
==========================================
  Files         595      602       +7     
  Lines       64056    66161    +2105     
  Branches      660      606      -54     
==========================================
+ Hits         8873    12293    +3420     
+ Misses      55183    53868    -1315     
Flag Coverage Δ
web 18.58% <0.00%> (+4.72%) ⬆️
web-beta 18.58% <0.00%> (+4.72%) ⬆️
web-classic 18.58% <0.00%> (+4.72%) ⬆️
web-utils 18.58% <0.00%> (+4.72%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Visualizer/convert.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/beta/features/Published/convert-new-property.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 128 files with indirect coverage changes

@airslice airslice merged commit 8baf2eb into main Nov 1, 2024
15 checks passed
@airslice airslice deleted the fix/default-style-on-czml-kml branch November 1, 2024 04:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant