From 428eb10e44dd2ca3dee80bbc9ab774259a65286a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "yuuji.yaginuma" <yuuji.yaginuma@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 16:11:09 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Use a fully qualified name in warning messages

Currently, some warning messages don't contain a `URI` like the following.

```ruby
warning: URI::ABS_URI is obsolete. Use RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[:ABS_URI] explicitly.
```

But, without `URI` prefix, the suggested value doesn't work.
So I think we should use a fully qualified name to avoid confusion.
---
 lib/uri/common.rb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/uri/common.rb b/lib/uri/common.rb
index bf28dea..db19e8e 100644
--- a/lib/uri/common.rb
+++ b/lib/uri/common.rb
@@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ def self.const_missing(const) # :nodoc:
       warn "URI::REGEXP is obsolete. Use URI::RFC2396_REGEXP explicitly.", uplevel: 1 if $VERBOSE
       URI::RFC2396_REGEXP
     elsif value = RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[const]
-      warn "URI::#{const} is obsolete. Use RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[#{const.inspect}] explicitly.", uplevel: 1 if $VERBOSE
+      warn "URI::#{const} is obsolete. Use URI::RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[#{const.inspect}] explicitly.", uplevel: 1 if $VERBOSE
       value
     elsif value = RFC2396_Parser.const_get(const)
-      warn "URI::#{const} is obsolete. Use RFC2396_Parser::#{const} explicitly.", uplevel: 1 if $VERBOSE
+      warn "URI::#{const} is obsolete. Use URI::RFC2396_Parser::#{const} explicitly.", uplevel: 1 if $VERBOSE
       value
     else
       super