Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't abort compilation after giving a lint error #447

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
jyn514 opened this issue Jul 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

Don't abort compilation after giving a lint error #447

jyn514 opened this issue Jul 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team

Comments

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Jul 22, 2021

Proposal

Instead, continue to compile, and only exit with an error just before linking. The only reason to abort early is when the program is so broken that either:

  1. later passes get confused and ICE
  2. any diagnostics from later passes would be noise

This is never the case for lints, because the compiler has to be able to deal with allow-ed lints.
So it can continue to lint and compile even if there are lint errors. In particular, this shows all lints at once, which can currently be frustrating when deny(warnings) is set or you trip a deny-by-default lint.

This has been requested a few times by users; see rust-lang/rust#82761, rust-lang/rust#87334.

This has already been implemented in rust-lang/rust#87337 (modulo some test updates).

Mentors or Reviewers

@flip1995, @LeSeulArtichaut

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:

  • File an issue describing the proposal.
  • A compiler team member or contributor who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second.
    • Finding a "second" suffices for internal changes. If however, you are proposing a new public-facing feature, such as a -C flag, then full team check-off is required.
    • Compiler team members can initiate a check-off via @rfcbot fcp merge on either the MCP or the PR.
  • Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins. If no objections are raised after 10 days, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

Comments

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

@jyn514 jyn514 added T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc labels Jul 22, 2021
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 22, 2021

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

cc @rust-lang/compiler @rust-lang/compiler-contributors

@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Jul 22, 2021
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 22, 2021

@rustbot second

@rustbot rustbot added the final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement label Jul 22, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Jul 31, 2021
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

apiraino commented Aug 5, 2021

@rustbot label -final-comment-period +major-change-accepted

@apiraino apiraino closed this as completed Aug 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement labels Aug 5, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Aug 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants