Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH #49502

Closed
sfackler opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Tracking issue for SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH #49502

sfackler opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 9 comments
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

Added in #49501

@sfackler sfackler added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. labels Mar 30, 2018
@sfackler
Copy link
Member Author

@rfcbot fcp merge

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Apr 23, 2018

Team member @sfackler has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Apr 23, 2018
@sfackler
Copy link
Member Author

For background, this is currently a stable constant in std::time, and this issue tracks it as an associated constant of SystemTime, which is way more discoverable.

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Apr 25, 2018

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Apr 25, 2018
@rfcbot rfcbot added the finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. label May 5, 2018
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented May 5, 2018

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@rfcbot rfcbot removed the final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. label May 5, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2018
@losvedir
Copy link

losvedir commented Jul 7, 2018

For others that found themselves on this issue from a compilation error on rust 1.27, I fixed it by changing:

use std::time::SystemTime;
SystemTime::now().duration_since(SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH);

to

use std::time::{SystemTime, UNIX_EPOCH};
SystemTime::now().duration_since(UNIX_EPOCH);

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

@losvedir Was the error message about the feature being unstable? The module-level constant is older, but the associated constant on the type was stabilized in 1.28 which is currently in beta.

@losvedir
Copy link

losvedir commented Jul 7, 2018

Yes, the error I got was:

error[E0658]: use of unstable library feature 'assoc_unix_epoch' (see issue #49502)
   --> src/main.rs:127:38
    |
127 |     SystemTime::now().duration_since(SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH).expect("unix time can't be calculated").as_secs() as u32
    |                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think I found the SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH approach on stack overflow. I'm a brand new rustacean (?) and it wasn't immediately obvious to me from this issue (linked in the compilation error) or the docs that there was a soon-to-be-deprecated (I imagine) approach that works on stable currently.

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

I don’t know that we’re gonna deprecate the module-level constant. It’s sometimes slightly less convenient, but not "harmful" enough that we should actively push existing users to migrate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants