Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove some unnecessary rustc_const_unstable #137516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

If the function is anyway unstable, it doesn't need to be rustc_const_unstable.

copy_from_slice turns out to not do anything const-unstable itself, we just haven't stably committed to it being available in const yet. See here for more details on the rustc_const_stable_indirect attribute.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 24, 2025

r? @Amanieu

rustbot has assigned @Amanieu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 24, 2025
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Feb 24, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 24, 2025

📌 Commit 68543ab has been approved by Amanieu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 24, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
…nup, r=Amanieu

remove some unnecessary rustc_const_unstable

If the function is anyway unstable, it doesn't need to be `rustc_const_unstable`.

`copy_from_slice` turns out to not do anything const-unstable itself, we just haven't stably committed to it being available in const yet. See [here](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/stability.html?highlight=rustc_const_stable_indirect) for more details on the `rustc_const_stable_indirect` attribute.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#136775 (Update `String::from_raw_parts` safety requirements)
 - rust-lang#137373 (Compile run-make-support and run-make tests with the bootstrap compiler)
 - rust-lang#137489 (remove `#[rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridde]`)
 - rust-lang#137493 (configure.py: don't instruct user to run nonexistent program)
 - rust-lang#137516 (remove some unnecessary rustc_const_unstable)
 - rust-lang#137527 (Update stdarch)
 - rust-lang#137530 (DWARF mixed versions with LTO on MIPS)
 - rust-lang#137539 ( Add rustdoc-gui regression test for rust-lang#137082 )
 - rust-lang#137543 (std: Fix another new symlink test on Windows)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@bors rollup

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134655 (Stabilize `hash_extract_if`)
 - rust-lang#135933 (Explain how Vec::with_capacity is faithful)
 - rust-lang#136668 (Stabilize `core::str::from_utf8_mut` as `const`)
 - rust-lang#136775 (Update `String::from_raw_parts` safety requirements)
 - rust-lang#137109 (stabilize extract_if)
 - rust-lang#137349 (Implement `read_buf` for zkVM stdin)
 - rust-lang#137493 (configure.py: don't instruct user to run nonexistent program)
 - rust-lang#137516 (remove some unnecessary rustc_const_unstable)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 91dc3ee into rust-lang:master Feb 25, 2025
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137516 - RalfJung:rustc_const_unstable-cleanup, r=Amanieu

remove some unnecessary rustc_const_unstable

If the function is anyway unstable, it doesn't need to be `rustc_const_unstable`.

`copy_from_slice` turns out to not do anything const-unstable itself, we just haven't stably committed to it being available in const yet. See [here](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/stability.html?highlight=rustc_const_stable_indirect) for more details on the `rustc_const_stable_indirect` attribute.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.87.0 milestone Feb 25, 2025
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the rustc_const_unstable-cleanup branch February 26, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants